New Article

The provision for Ordinary Cessation of Activity on that which indirectly explains the DGT via the enquiry V0637-17, qualifies these yields for the purpose of the PERSONAL INCOME TAX such as earned incomes and not of the activity just as it establishes the article 17.1b) of the Act 35/2006, of 28 November, of the Personal income tax and of partial modification of laws of the Corporation taxes, on the Income of not Residents and on the Heritage; nonetheless with respect to the decision of the Ministry of the Treasury is that provisions for cessation of activity linked to the COVID 19 pay taxes for earned incomes in the model 100 of the annual income of progressive way according to the stretch being exempt the first 2,000 perceived euros.

Before binding enquiry the Directorate General of Tax contributions V3130-20 answers the following thing:

“The total exclusion or partial of the payment of the fees of the RETA as derived from a non-existence of obligation or exemption, determines its lack of incidence in the Personal income tax, when not corresponding to none of suppositions of income acquisition established in the article 6 of the Act 35/2006, of 28 November, of the Personal income tax and of partial modification of laws of the Corporation taxes, on the Income of the not Residents and on the Heritage (BOE of 29 November), not having therefore whole yield nature nor correlativamente that one of deductible expenditure for the determination of the yields, without can consider in turn the existence of a yield of work in case the payment of the fees of the RETA would have been agreed by the society in which the consultante provides its services, when not existing the obligation of the above-mentioned payment during the period to that which adverts the exemption.